Post by POETICDRINK2U(POE) on Jun 29, 2022 22:59:32 GMT -5
[Placeholder until 100% guaranteed in game]
JUDGES
Judges have come under a lot of controversial for decisions and this has been a part of boxing since men began throwing punches at each other in the “sport”. Judges are rated in several categories. All judges should be assigned up to two (2) biases. On default ESBC judges may not visually be assigned biases due to various real life possibilities. A judge should be assigned a bias in one of five categories: hometown, champion, boxer, slugger, reputation.
How a Bias Rating should be used: a specific judge has a pre-set bias in favor of a hometown fighter, defending champion, slugger or boxer, or any combination of the four. No judge in the database should be assigned a bias because of potential problems in labeling a real person with a bias. However, a player should be able to assign one via the Judges screen or edits in a database.
Bias Descriptions:
Hometown: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter designated as the hometown fighter and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the hometown fighter.
Champion: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter designated as the champion and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the champion.
Boxer: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose style is that of a boxer and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of a boxer.
Slugger: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose style is that of a slugger and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of a slugger.
Reputation: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose reputation (overall rating) is the higher and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the higher profile fighter.
Judges Scoring Tendencies
There should be an ability to assign a judge a percentage representing his tendency to give the benefit of the doubt to the high scorer in a close round, to call a close round even, or to give the benefit of the doubt to the low scorer in a close round.
Assume a judge has the following ratings: High Scores: 85; Even Scores: 3; and Low Scores: 12. These number mean that in a close round, this judge will score the round 10-9 in favor of the High Scorer 85% of the time; will score the round 10-10 only 3% of the time; and will score the round in favor of the Low Scorer 12% of the time.
These percentages are based upon data compiled from actual official score cards. When rating a new judge or editing an existing judge, the three scoring percentage MUST add up to 100%.
Other add-ons
None: Self-explanatory. The judge does not lean in any direction and simply scores each round on face value.
Random: The computer will assign a bias at random to each of the judges.
An idea I hope is used When a bias is assigned, regardless of how, scoring may be affected in any given round. For example, assume that a judge has a bias in favor of a hometown fighter. That judge will give the hometown fighter the benefit of the doubt in a close round and have a tendency to either score the round in favor of the hometown fighter or at least call the round even. In a round in which the hometown fighter is badly beaten, the biased judge might score the round 10-9 in favor of the hometown fighter’s opponent rather than 10-8.
JUDGES
Judges have come under a lot of controversial for decisions and this has been a part of boxing since men began throwing punches at each other in the “sport”. Judges are rated in several categories. All judges should be assigned up to two (2) biases. On default ESBC judges may not visually be assigned biases due to various real life possibilities. A judge should be assigned a bias in one of five categories: hometown, champion, boxer, slugger, reputation.
How a Bias Rating should be used: a specific judge has a pre-set bias in favor of a hometown fighter, defending champion, slugger or boxer, or any combination of the four. No judge in the database should be assigned a bias because of potential problems in labeling a real person with a bias. However, a player should be able to assign one via the Judges screen or edits in a database.
Bias Descriptions:
Hometown: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter designated as the hometown fighter and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the hometown fighter.
Champion: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter designated as the champion and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the champion.
Boxer: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose style is that of a boxer and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of a boxer.
Slugger: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose style is that of a slugger and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of a slugger.
Reputation: A tendency to give a close round to the fighter whose reputation (overall rating) is the higher and will often score detrimental 10-8 rounds 10-9 and 10-7 rounds 10-8 in favor of the higher profile fighter.
Judges Scoring Tendencies
There should be an ability to assign a judge a percentage representing his tendency to give the benefit of the doubt to the high scorer in a close round, to call a close round even, or to give the benefit of the doubt to the low scorer in a close round.
Assume a judge has the following ratings: High Scores: 85; Even Scores: 3; and Low Scores: 12. These number mean that in a close round, this judge will score the round 10-9 in favor of the High Scorer 85% of the time; will score the round 10-10 only 3% of the time; and will score the round in favor of the Low Scorer 12% of the time.
These percentages are based upon data compiled from actual official score cards. When rating a new judge or editing an existing judge, the three scoring percentage MUST add up to 100%.
Other add-ons
None: Self-explanatory. The judge does not lean in any direction and simply scores each round on face value.
Random: The computer will assign a bias at random to each of the judges.
An idea I hope is used When a bias is assigned, regardless of how, scoring may be affected in any given round. For example, assume that a judge has a bias in favor of a hometown fighter. That judge will give the hometown fighter the benefit of the doubt in a close round and have a tendency to either score the round in favor of the hometown fighter or at least call the round even. In a round in which the hometown fighter is badly beaten, the biased judge might score the round 10-9 in favor of the hometown fighter’s opponent rather than 10-8.